Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +12657%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GP102
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy