Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +2796%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G86
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
17W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy