Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +94%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy