Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
19448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +710334%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
19456
4
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
MI300
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
146 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy