Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1266MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +137%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU117
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy