NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1687MHz vs 1569MHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+7%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Mobile
84
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+50%
126
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
20
2560
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
