Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 250 vs FirePro S9150

GeForce GTS 250 vs FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 250 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
FirePro S9150 Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
FirePro S9150 +1209%
5069
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy