Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K20Xm

Quadro M2000 vs Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Tesla K20Xm +120%
3935
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Tesla K20Xm +156%
372
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Tesla K20Xm +125%
63
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
2688
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK110
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy