Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +18575%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
7680
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy