Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +36%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
576
Shading Units
448
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy