NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+523%
13.41 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+416%
10406
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+408%
4783
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
-
SM Count
48
1024
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
Vega 20
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
