Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
9200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
A10G +108589%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
9216
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy