Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +61%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Hawaii
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy