CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1594%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
240
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T1000
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
7
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy