Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 250 vs FireGL V7600

GeForce GTS 250 vs FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 250 Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
FireGL V7600 Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (127W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
FireGL V7600
384
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
127W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
R600
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)

4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy