Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+5753%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
112
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
